Moxibustion Treatment for Knee Pain: A Systematic Review

Article information

Acupunct. 2015;32(3):135-146
1Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, Korean Medicine Hospital of Woosuk University
2Department of Korean Oriental Pediatrics, Korean Medicine of Woosuk University
3Department of Meridian & Acupoint, College of Korean Medicine, Woosuk University
*Corresponding author : Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine, Korean Medicine Hospital of Woosuk University, 46, Eoeun-ro, Wansan-gu, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do 54987, Republic of Korea, Tel : +82-63-220-8625, E-mail :
Received 2015 August 12; Revised 2015 September 02; Accepted 2015 September 03.



This study was designed to evaluate clinical evidence of moxibustion treatment for knee pain.


All processes were independently carried out by three investigators. A literature search was performed in 3 databases from their inception to May 2015. Ten reports were found based on their title, abstract and text. Following this, data extraction and analysis were done using a risk of bias(ROB) and through an assessment of multiple systematic reviews(AMSTAR).


10 studies(6RCT, 2SR, 2CR) were included. Generally, indirect moxibustion was used for knee pain, but only one study indicated the use of direct moxibustion. Moxibustion was shown to be effective in treating knee pain, and the number of required treatments was fourteen on average. In assessing risk of bias, indefinite and uncertain information made all included trials subject to a high risk of bias. On the other hand, SR showed all evaluation items in the assessment of multiple systematic reviews, with the exception of an included or excluded studies list.


Because of deficient study design or limited research planning, there is not sufficient evidence to allow for any conclusion about the efficacy of moxibustion for knee pain. Therefore, well-designed high quality trials are needed from now on.

Fig. 1

Flowchart of trial selection process

Summary of Studies of Moxibustion in Knee Pain with Systematic Review

‘Risk of Bias’ Assessment in Included RCT

‘Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews’ Assessment in Included SR


1. Park HJ, Son CG. Overview for moxibustion-related researches worldwide. Korean J Acupunct 2008;25(3):167–74.
2. Lim HJ, Yoon JH. An historic study on the school that attached importance to moxibustion. The Acupuncture 2000;17(2):54.
3. Lee GM, Lee GS, Lee SH, et al. The study of stand-ardization plan and usefulness of moxa combustion. The Acupuncture 2003;20(6):63–79.
4. The Korean Orthopaedic Association. Orthopedics Fifth edth ed. Seoul: Newest Medicine Company; 1999. p. 497–502.
5. Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine Society. Acupuncture clinical guideline for knee pain Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Medicine Society; 2013. p. 1–2.
6. Mannoni A, Briganti MP, Di Bari M, et al. Epidemiological profile of symptomatic osteoarthritis in older adults: a population based study in Dicomano, Italy. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62(6):576–8.
7. Kim HA, Kim YH, Song YW. The clinical char acteristics of patellofemoral oa in elderly female patients with knee pain. Journal of Rheumatic Diseases 2002;9(3):207.
8. Jang JH, Kim KH. A study on osteoarthritis of the knee. The Acupuncture 1998;15(2):493–509.
9. Lee KH, Ryu YJ, Sun SH, Kwon KR. The effect of burning acupuncture therapy on the traumatic injury of medial collateral ligament: report of five cases. The Acupuncture 2010;27(1):149–55.
10. Lee SH, Hong SJ, Kim SY, et al. Randomized controlled double blind study of bee venom therapy on rheumatoid arthritis. The Acupuncture 2003;20(6):80–8.
11. Na WM, Lee SY, Jang EH, et al. A study on pain relief effects and allergic responses for the osteoarthritis of the knee joint between sweet bee venom and bee venom pharmacopuncture. Journal of Pharmacopuncture 2007;10(2):47–55.
12. Lee JB, Cho YH, Im JG, Kim JU, Yook TH, Song BY. A case study of patients with knee joint pain treated with rubiae radix pharmAcoPuncture. Journal of Pharmacopuncture 2010;13(3):109–20.
13. Lee YR, Kim EJ, Cho HS, Lee SD, Kim KS, Kim KH. Interview survey methods for moxibustion treatment of knee pain, neck pain and back pain: subject to oriental doctors in Seoul. The Acupuncture 2011;28(2):1–11.
14. Kim SW, Hong SJ, Park SH, Jung CY, Yoon EH, Lee SD. Some results from a sample survey on the use of moxibustion therapeutics in Korea. The Acupuncture 2010;27(2):115–21.
15. Han CH, Shin MS, Shin SH, Kang KW, Park SH, Choi SM. Telephone survey for grasping clinical actual stage of moxibustion therapeutics in Korea. Korean J Acupunct 2007;24(3):17–31.
16. Han CH, Shin MS, Kang KW, Kang BK, Park SH, Choi SM. An in-depth interview for use of moxibustion therapy in Korea. Korean J Acupunct 2008;25(1):85–97.
17. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Internet] Version 510 Chichester(UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011. [updated 2011 Mar]. Chapter 8, Assessing risk of bias in included studies ; [cited 2011 Mar 20]. Available from :
18. Sohn HJ. Assessing methodological quality of Korean systematic review using amstar [dissertation] Seoul: Korea Univ; 2012. Korean.
19. Park JS, Woo SN, Yeo HJ, et al. The effect of hand moxibustion therapy on knee joint pain, joint range of motion and discomfort during ADL in elderly people. Journal of KAFN 2003;10(2):244–53.
20. Choi JH, Ko YJ, Lee SH, et al. Case report of moxibustion therapy for a osteoarthritis patient with stroke. The Journal of Korean Spine & Joint Academy 2005;2(1):27–34.
21. Park JS, Kwon SJ, Kwon YS. The effects of Dogbi (ST35) & sulan moxibustion on knee joint pain, range of motion and discomfort during ADL in the aged. J Korean Acad Nurs 2006;36(1):189–96.
22. Doh MH, Kim TY. Effects of the moxibustion therapy on the pain decrease and joint recovery with degenerative knee Arthritis. SPKOM 2009;13(1):81–92.
23. Choi TY, Kim TH, Kang JW, et al. Moxibustion for rheumatic conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 2011;30(7):937–45.
24. Choi TY, Choi J, Kim KH, et al. Moxibustion for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 2012;32(10):2969–78.
25. Oh MJ, Song HS. Effect of moxibustion therapy on the degenerative arthritis of knee joint with osteochondroma. The Acupuncture 2012;29(6):111–7.
26. Kim TH, Kim KH, Kang JW, et al. Moxibustion treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a multi-centre, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness and safety of the moxibustion treatment versus usual care in knee osteoarthritis patients. PLoS One 2014;9(7):1–8.
27. Zhao L, Cheng K, Wang L, et al. Effectiveness of moxibustion treatment as adjunctive therapy in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Arthritis Research & Therapy 2014;16(3):1–8.
28. Ren X, Yao C, Wu F, et al. Effectiveness of moxibustion treatment in quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Evidence-Based Complenentary and Alternative Medicine 2015;2015(2015):1–6.
29. Beksinska ME, Joanis C, Smit JA, Pienaar J, Piaggio G. Using scratch card technology for random allocation concealment in a clinical trial with a crossover design. Clin Trials 2013;10(1):125–30.
30. Viera AJ, Bangdiwala SI. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking. Fam Med 2007;39(2):132–7.
31. Lee CK. Acupuncture trials for peripheral facial palsy in republic of Korea: a systematic review. The Acupuncture 2013;30(3):57.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Flowchart of trial selection process

Table 1

Summary of Studies of Moxibustion in Knee Pain with Systematic Review

Year/author Patient/problem Study/design Treatment points Treatment duration Rating scale Results
2003/Park19) DA RCT A16, A12, A8, E38, F9, I33, J7, M26, N9, I19, M28(moxibustion on hand) Once a day for 10 days ROM
2005/Choi20) OA CR Hak-Jeong(Heding, M-LE-27)
Yang-Seul-Ahn(Xiyan, MN-LE-16)
Once a day for 2 weeks VAS, MPQ
Circumference of knee
2006/Park21) DA RCT Dokbi(ST35), Yang-Seul-Ahn(Xiyan, MN-LE-16) Once a day for 15 days NRS, ROM, ADL T>C
2009/Doh22) DA RCT Dokbi(ST35), Yang-Seul-Ahn(Xiyan, MN-LE-16), Bokto(ST32), Hyeolhae(SP10), Gokcheon(LR8), Yangneugcheon(GB34), Eumneungcheon(SP9) Three times a week for 4 weeks VAS, LSS T>C
2011/Choi23) RA SR Mox+med>med
2012/Choi24) OA SR Mox>med
2012/Oh25) DA CR Yangneugcheon(GB34), Dokbi(ST35), Yangneugcheon(GB34), Eumneungcheon(SP9), Hyeolhae(SP10), Yanggu(ST34), Joksamni(ST36) and one or two Ashi points Three times a day for 12 days VAS, WOMAC Valid
2014/Kim26) OA RCT Dokbi(ST35),Yanggu(ST34), Joksamni(ST36), Eumneungcheon(SP9), Hyeolhae(SP10) and two Ashi points Three times a week for 4 weeks WOMAC, SF-36(Short-Form 36)
BDI(Beck Depression Inventory)
PNRS(Pain Numerical Rating Scale)
The Physical Functional Test Patient Global Assessment The Safety Assessment
T>C (other rating scale)
2014/Zhao27) OA RCT Dokbi(ST35), Yang-Seul-Ahn(Xiyan, MN-LE-16) and Ashi points Three times a week for 6 weeks WOMAC T>C
2015/Ren28) OA RCT Dokbi(ST35), Yang-Seul-Ahn(Xiyan, MN-LE-16) and Ashi points Three times a week for 6 weeks SF-36(Short-Form 36) T>C

DA : degenerative arthritis. OA : osteoarthritis. RA : rheumatoid arthritis. RCT : randomized controlled trial. SR : systematic review. CR : case report. Mox : moxibustion.

Med : medication. GRS : graphic rating scale. VAS : visual analogue scale. MPQ : McGil pain questionnaire. NRS : numerical rating scale. ROM : range of motion.

ADL : activities of daily living. LSS : Lysholm scoring scale. WOMAC : Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. SF-36 : short-form 36.

BDI : beck depression inventory. PNRS : pain numerical rating scale.

Table 2

‘Risk of Bias’ Assessment in Included RCT

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
Park 200319) U U H L H L U
Park 200621) U U H L L L U
Doh 200922) U U H L L L U
Kim 201426) L L H L L L U
Zhao 201427) L H L L L L U
Ren 201528) L H L L L L U

L : low risk of bias. H : high risk of bias.

U : uncertain risk of bias.

Table 3

‘Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews’ Assessment in Included SR

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11
Choi 201123) Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y
Choi 201224) Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y

Y : yes. N : no. CA : can’t answer. NA : not applicable.